Digital processing disruption systems

ABSTRACT

A method and apparatus are described for modifying an analogue video signal to impair its conversion to a digital signal by an analogue to digital converter. The resulting modified signal may prevent the operation of the analogue to digital converter altogether, or even if a digital signal can be output and recorded, may result in a signal which is difficult to view due to a reduction in quality on playback. The modifications made to the signal include altering the amplitude of the horizontal synchronization pulses in the original signal, and/or modifying the level of the back porch, or the region of the signal adjacent the back porch. Additionally, methods are contemplated for the use of specific response models for target analogue to digital converters, and display devices.

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.10/559,715, filed Jun. 5, 2006, which is a National Stage entry ofPCT/GB04/02415, filed Jun. 7, 2004, which application claims priority toGB 0312985.5, filed Jun. 5, 2003, all of which are incorporated byreference herein in their entireties.

The present invention relates to methods of disrupting the processing ofvideo signals, so as to inhibit copying, and to systems forcounteracting such disruption methods.

It is well known that films and other video material distributed onvideo tape, or by means such as direct broadcast or cable, are oftensubject to copying onto tape, much of which is in breach of the rightsowners' rights.

As a result technologies have been developed which modify the videosignal recorded on the original video tape, or in the form in which itis otherwise distributed, in a way which interferes with the normaloperation of a standard video recorder so that copies made of suchmodified video signals cannot be played, or the viewability or playbackquality of such recorded video signals is impaired. One well known suchtechnology is licensed by Macrovision Corporation.

Recently, digital technology has become available for distribution ofvideo material. Concerns have been expressed that such material is ofmuch higher quality and thus that much higher quality copies may bemade. In addition, it is now possible to make digital copies of videomaterial that is intended for viewing on display devices such astelevision receivers or similar apparatus, and, once made, these can befurther reproduced with little degradation in quality. It has been foundthat the existing copy protection processes, such as that most commonlylicensed by Macrovision, are not effective, at least in somecircumstances, to prevent digital copying of analogue video signals.

We have therefore appreciated that there is a need for further copyprotection technology to impair copying of analogue video material todigital form.

The invention is defined by the independent claims to which referenceshould now be made. Advantageous features are set forth in the appendantclaims.

Preferred embodiments of the invention will now be described in moredetail, by way of example, and with reference to the drawings in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates the horizontal blanking interval of a conventionalvideo signal, extending from the end of the active video on the earlierline, to the beginning of the active video on the following line;

FIG. 2 shows generally and schematically a modified video signal inaccordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 3 shows generally and schematically a modified video signal inaccordance with an alternative embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 4 shows an alternative implementation of the modificationillustrated in FIG. 3;

FIG. 5 shows a specific example of a modified video signal in accordancewith a preferred embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 6 shows a corresponding oscilloscope trace of the signal of FIG. 5;

FIG. 7 shows an analogue video signal trace modified using a method andapparatus according to a preferred embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 8 shows a recorded image, which has not been modified according tothe preferred embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 9 shows the image when recorded after modification in accordancewith a preferred embodiment of the invention; and

FIG. 10 schematically shows the steps comprising a method according tothe preferred embodiment

The preferred embodiment of the invention provides a method of modifyinga video signal in a manner which impairs its conversion by an analogueto digital video converter. The term analogue to digital video converteris used to refer to any system which converts an analogue video signalinto a digital signal, and may therefore also include video capturesystems using such converters. Examples of such systems are videocapture cards, and systems such as the TIVO system, and DVD recorders.

It is not material whether the resulting digital signal is recorded ornot, although clearly following most conversion processes the digitalsignal is recorded at least temporarily. Otherwise the signal may simplybe processed in digital processing equipment.

As is well known, a conventional analogue video signal includes severalvideo components. One of these components is a pulse which is designedto identify the point at which the end of one line of active videooccurs, and the next starts (at which point the television set executesa horizontal retrace). This pulse is known as a horizontalsynchronisation pulse. Immediately prior to the horizontalsynchronisation pulse, there is a region known as the front porch, andimmediately after the horizontal synchronisation pulse there is a regionknown as the back porch. The latter extends from the horizontalsynchronisation pulse to the beginning of the active video—the point atwhich the picture information starts for the next line.

FIG. 1, illustrates a conventional analogue video signal. The signaltrace 2 starts with the end of the active video 4 preceding a horizontalblanking interval 6. The end of the active video line is followed by thefront porch 8, and the horizontal sync pulse 10. Following thehorizontal sync pulse, the back porch 12 is shown and, in part of theback porch, the colour burst 14. At the end of the trace, the beginningof the active video for the next line is shown. The pulse tip 16 of thehorizontal sync pulse 10 descends to a level of about −300 mV. The levelof the signal in the back porch is shown as about 0V. In some VTR copyprotection systems, these levels may be adjusted over part of the backporch.

A modified video signal, according to a preferred embodiment of thepresent invention, will now be described. The modified video signal issuch that the signal when viewed on a standard television or otherdisplay device shows an image of acceptable viewability, but, whenapplied to a video capture system either cannot be properly converted oris converted to a digital signal which cannot be played or which, whenplayed, shows an image which is not of acceptable viewability. Themodifications to the video signal in the modified video signal arereferred to below as “disruption components”.

The modifications or disruption components take the form of a horizontalsync pulse with altered amplitude, as well as an additional pulse addedto the back porch, or to the region adjacent the back porch in theactive line of the signal. The amplitude of the horizontal sync pulsemay be altered, either by increasing its amplitude over at least part ofthe duration of the pulse, or reducing its amplitude over at least partof the duration of the pulse. The amplitude of the sync pulse In thiscase is understood to be the difference between 0V and, the level of thetip of the sync pulse.

In accordance with broadcast standards applicable to NTSC and PAL videosignals the horizontal sync pulse typically has an amplitude of about−300 mV, relative to the black level, or black clamping level. In such acase the sync pulse amplitude of the modified video signal is arrangedto be between −280 mV and −150 mV, that is from 20 mV to 150 mV higherthan the normal level, and preferably between −250 mV and −200 mV.

Alternatively the sync pulse absolute amplitude may be increased. Forexample the amplitude may be increased to a level of −600 mV. Preferablyit is increased to a level of between −320 mV and −500 mV, preferablyabout −350 mV and −450 mV.

In either case the increase or decrease in amplitude is for at leastpart of the duration of the sync pulse. Preferably it is for a durationof about 30 to 100% of the pulse in the case of an increase and 30 to90% in the case of a decrease, for example for a duration of between 50%and 100% and 50% and 90% respectively of the pulse duration. Preferablythe duration is from about 2 to 4 microseconds, preferably about 3microseconds. The amplitude decrease or increase may occur at thebeginning, in the middle, or at the end of the pulse; however,preferably in the case of a decrease in absolute amplitude it occursafter the beginning of the sync pulse and may continue to the end of thesync pulse.

FIG. 2 schematically shows a series of modifications in accordance withthe preferred embodiment of the invention. The modifications are shownby dotted outlines. A horizontal sync pulse with increased amplitude isshown as a dotted line 20. This peak of the pulse is lower than theunmodified level of the sync pulse tip 16, at a position of about −450mV. Alternatively, a horizontal sync pulse with decreased amplitude isshown by a dotted line 22. This is higher than the unmodified sync pulsetip 16 at a level of about −200 mV. Lowering or raising the amplitude ofthe horizontal sync pulse in this way has been unexpectedly found toimpair the operation of many analogue to digital converters to which themodified signal may be input.

The alteration in amplitude may occur on each line on which a horizontalsynchronisation pule occurs, or it may occur on only some such lines. Ifthe altered pulses do not occur on every line, they may be clustered,for example they may occur particularly in advance of the verticalblanking interval. Further the alterations may vary from line to line orfrom one group of lines to another. The alterations may be absent insome fields and present in other fields. For example the increasedamplitude alteration may occur on a cluster of lines, followed by thereduced amplitude alteration. There should be sufficient altered linesto ensure an appropriate level of effectiveness.

One effect of the horizontal sync pulse amplitude alterations is tochange the brightness of the image on capture by the video capturesystem. Thus a decreased amplitude alteration results in the image beingconverted and/or recorded at a level brighter than the original. Inextreme cases this may result in saturation of the image, with theresult that areas of the image appear white. The increased amplitudealteration has the effect that the image is converted and/or recordedless brightly than the original, and may result in significant loss ofvisible definition in the viewed image. Switching between the increasedamplitude alteration and the reduced amplitude alteration can cause anirritating change in brightness of the viewed image, on capture by thevideo capture system.

Additionally, the preferred embodiment of a modified video signalincludes at least a part of the back porch, which is made higher orlower in comparison to the 0V level. Alternatively modification to aregion of the active video line adjacent the back porch, preferablymaking it negative, can also be used, and this will be described later.

In accordance with the broadcast standards applicable to NTSC and PALsignals the region after the horizontal sync pulse called the back porchcontains information which is designed to enable the television receiverto decipher a video signal correctly. In particular, the mean level ofthe back porch, or part of it, has a voltage level of 0V, and is used todetermine the “black level” of the television receiver, that is thesignal level which represents black on the image. The disruptioncomponent used in the back porch is therefore a positive or negativepulse, preferably having a positive or negative amplitude of between 30and 200 mV, preferably from 50 to 150 mV.

Such a pulse may vary in duration, preferably it has a duration of about250 ns to 4 μs, preferably 1 μs to 4 μs, for example around 3 μs. Thepulse may occur immediately following the horizontal synchronisationpulse, or at a period after the horizontal synchronisation pulse, forexample during the colour burst; preferably it occurs during the colourburst or about 4.8 μs after the falling (leading) edge of the horizontalsync pulse, in a PAL standard signal.

FIG. 2 therefore also shows modifications to the back porch according tothe preferred embodiment. A back porch with a level lower than theconventional unmodified level is shown by the lower dotted line 24.Alternatively, a back porch with a level higher than the conventionalunmodified level is shown by the lower dotted line 26.

It should be understood that the dotted lines show the signal when therelevant modification is present, and that the diagrams are intended tobe schematic and not to a uniform scale. Lowering or raising the levelof the back porch in this way has been unexpectedly found to impair theoperation of many analogue to digital converters to which the modifiedsignal may be input.

We have also found that the location of the additional pulse need not belimited to the back porch following the horizontal synchronizationpulse. It may for example occur later, preferably within 10 μs to 30 μsof the falling/leading edge of the horizontal sync pulse, assuming astandard PAL signal. This would mean however that the additional pulsewould occur in the active video region, and may occur partly in the backporch region as well. For this reason if the additional pulse is addedto the signal outside of the back porch, it should only be done so onlines which fall in the overscan part of the picture. Otherwise, thepresence of the pulse may be visible. The pulse can also be added duringthe vertical blanking part of the signal.

FIG. 3 schematically illustrates the location of this pulse 28. Thepulse added to this region is a negative going pulse with an amplitudein the range −30 mv to −300 mv. This has been found to confuse thevertical synchronisation separator components in the analogue to digitalconverter, as it appears like a vertical synchronisation pulse. Theduration of the pulse preferably varies in the range 10 μs to 58 μs,with the range 15 μs to 35 μs being most preferred.

FIG. 4 shows an alternative implementation to that described above withreference to FIG. 3. In FIG. 4, the negative going pulse is not a singlesquare pulse but is a high frequency pulse. The amplitude of the pulseshown in FIG. 4 is about −200 mV and the frequency is approximately4MHz, but amplitudes in the range 0 to −300 mV, and frequencies in therange 1 MHz to 6 MHz have also been found to be possible. The scaleshown on the oscilloscope trace is 0.1V per square.

FIG. 5 shows a specific example of a modified video signal according tothe preferred embodiment, using the same numerals as above for FIGS. 1and 2. In this case, a horizontal sync pulse with a decreased amplitudeis produced by incorporating a disruption component pulse 30 into thebottom of the sync pulse tip 16. The pulse 30 is located more or less inthe middle of the sync pulse. The amplitude of the sync pulse in theregion of the disruption component pulse is about −200 mV. Inexperiments with a DAZZLE video capture card, for example, we have foundthat a level between 60 to 85 mV above the sync pulse tip 16 producesgood results, as does a level of 70 to 110 mV below the sync pulse tip,in each case with a duration of about 3 μs.

FIG. 5 also shows the modification to the back porch. This is also inthe form of a pulse 32 inserted shortly after the end of the horizontalsync pulse, 10. This second disruption component pulse 32 appears in thecolour burst 6 and the oscillation of the colour burst on top 14′ of thepulse 32 can be seen. We have found that a pulse of 70 to 120 mV or −60to −80 mV produces effective results on the DAZZLE video capture card,for example, with an optimum pulse position of the leading edge of thepulse 4.8 μs after the leading edge of the sync pulse and duration of3.3 μs.

FIG. 6, shows a comparison between a first oscilloscope trace showing anunmodified signal, and an oscilloscope trace for a signal modified asshown in FIG. 5. The signal shows no video picture information, for thesake of clarity.

In a trial, a PAL video signal modified according to the preferredembodiment was applied to the input of a DAZZLE DV-Bridge external videocapture card, which was inserted into a PC running PowerDirectorsoftware. The modified signal is illustrated in the oscilloscope traceof in FIG. 5, in this case with a change of amplitude over the fullwidth of the sync pulse.

FIGS. 6 and 7 show recorded digital video signals. FIG. 6, showsplayback of a recorded signal converted from an analogue video signal towhich the modifications according to the invention have not been made.As shown, although the signal has been converted from the analogue tothe digital domain and converted, the viewability of the image is ofgood quality. FIG. 7 shows illustrates the playback of a video signalwith the same picture content, but which has been modified according tothe preferred embodiment of the invention. As can be seen, although thesignal has been converted Into the digital domain, the viewability ofthe signal has been greatly impaired and useful or enjoyable playback ofthe recorded signal is now impossible.

The same tests were carried out with other systems and a “TIVO” computerbased video recorder with similar results.

When the test was repeated with the DAZZLE Video Capture card using aNTSC standard signal modified in accordance with the invention, thevideo capture card/capture software stopped operating and no signal wasrecorded at all.

The modified video signal according to the preferred embodiment may berecorded on tape or other medium such as DVD or CD, including in adigital format, or may form part of a broadcast signal (which term isused to include video-on-demand), or may be introduced at the point ofuse by the user, for example in a system which decodes an incomingsignal, for example a digital signal, and provides an analogue outputfor use, for example, by a standard analogue input television set. Inthis way, it will not be possible to copy the signal via conversion to adigital signal. One method of breathing the right owner's rights willtherefore be prevented.

A method of disrupting the correct processing of a video signal by avideo capture system will now be described in more detail, withreference to FIG. 8. An analogue video signal, which is to be modifiedso as to impair the operation of a video capture system is firstreceived in step S2. The signal is then modified by altering the levelsof all or part of the horizontal synchronization pulse, step S4, and/orthe level of all or part of the back porch, step S6, as described above.Only one of these steps may be necessary, although both are preferred.The modified signal is then output in step S8. It may then be applied tothe input of an analogue to digital converter video capture system step10 for example. The video capture system is unlikely to be able toprocess the input video signal satisfactorily, and may give an outputwhich is a degraded or scrambled signal, or may give no output at all.

As described above, modification of the original video signal into aform which impairs capture, can be performed in a number of differentways, depending on whether the amplitudes of the horizontal sync pulse,and the level of the back porch are raised or lowered, over all or partof their width, or whether one or the other is not modified.Additionally, instead of modification of the back porch, a pulse may beadded after the horizontal sync pulse in a position which falls in theactive line of the video signal, preferably in regions which will not beviewed on screen.

The horizontal sync pulse alteration and back porch alteration may beused together, or separately. Preferably they are used together howeveras the effects can be more drastic. The effects which have been observedwhen using both modifications include complete loss of the signal by thevideo capture card, so that no conversion takes place at all, eitherthrough very severe break up or pixelation of the image leading tosubstantial degradation of the recorded image.

Choosing which of these modifications to make, and to what extent ishowever dependent on the target video capture system which it is desiredto impair. Video capture systems, such as video capture cards, DVDrecorders and bespoke recording systems such as “TIVO” systems may forexample vary in their ability to tolerate variations from the broadcaststandard signal. Preferably, therefore a response model for each of thetarget video capture systems is maintained. In the method, the step ofmodifying the original video signal, then involves consulting theresponse model, step S3, and selecting the modifications to make independence on the response model and the target video capture system.The dotted lines in FIG. 8 indicate that this step is optional butpreferred.

Alternatively, if the target video capture system is not known, thenpreferably the type of modification made to the original video signal isvaried from line to line, or every pre-determined number of lines, suchthat the effect of the modification is experienced at least periodicallyin any resulting signal that is recorded. This will still impair theresulting playback sufficiently so that the resulting recorded signal isnot enjoyable to view. The variation of the modifications can be basedon different response models which are cycled in turn as describedabove.

Varying the amplitude of the modifications can additionally giveimproved playback on the display device as well as an increase ineffectiveness of the protection. For example, If the amplitude of themodification is varied between zero, at which point the signal isidentical to the original, unmodified signal, and full scale, at whichthe modifications are present at a maximum strength, then the displaydevice can often compensate during the unmodified regions for anyinstability caused during the modified regions. Varying the amplitude ofthe modification to the horizontal synchronisation pulse in this waywill be understood to be equivalent to varying the amplitude of thehorizontal sync pulse itself.

The effect of the modifications is still experienced when analogue todigital conversion is attempted. Varying the signal between zero andfull scale with a period of between 100 ms and 4 s has been found inpractice to have a beneficial effect.

Also, it will be appreciated that the modified signal needs still to beviewable on a display device such as a television when it is received inits analogue un-recorded form. Also, as is well known, the ability oftelevision sets of different manufacture to display video signalsvaries. Thus some television sets are able to display signals whichdiffer from the normal broadcast signal adequately or to an acceptablelevel of viewability, while others are not able to do so or only displaysuch a signal poorly. The method above may therefore preferably containa step of consulting a display device response model to check forcompatibility. This is also shown as step S3 in FIG. 8.

Apparatus for creating the modified signal in accordance with theinvention can be made in accordance with well known principles by thoseskilled in the art. For example, in the case of a pre-existing videosignal, the signal can be fed into a circuit which identifies thesynchronization pulse. The circuit is commonly known as a syncseparator. A separate circuit which is triggered by the timinginformation from the sync separator can then be used to generate thesignals of each of the desired disruption components, at the correcttiming for addition to the unmodified video signal, and the generatedsignals can be added to the unmodified signals, for example through amixing circuit.

Means for creating a modified video signal in accordance with theinvention could be implemented as hardware or as software, or as acombination of hardware and software components.

Systems for processing an analogue video signal to create a modifiedanalogue signal at the output may be provided for example to consumers,in the form of set top boxes or the like. In such a case, the system maybe adjustable so as to optimise viewability for the particulartelevision viewing equipment used by that consumer while ensuring anoptimal level of conversion impairment. To achieve this converterresponse model and a display device response model data areincorporated, as a look up table for example, in the device, so that theuser can select at least the display device used.

The invention further provides for a system holding data comprisinginformation about the parameter optimisation for a representative set oftelevision viewing equipment and video capture systems, and may furtherprovide means for remotely setting the parameters in accordance with theinformation in the data holding system and information provided by theuser.

Such systems may further be switchable remotely, so that only certainprogramme material is modified by the inclusion of disruptioncomponents, while other material may be left unmodified so that the usercan make acceptable copies of it.

The above description of a method and corresponding apparatus assumesthat a response model for the video capture systems is known when themodifications are applied to the original video signal. If this is notthe case however, or If it desired to generate such a model, then itwill be necessary to investigate the effects of the modifications ondifferent video capture systems, as well as different display devices,and make a decision as to which modifications are desirable and whichare not

Rather than cycling the types of modifications made, it may bebeneficial to determine an optimised modification for the largest rangeof capture devices and display devices possible. The modified videosignal should of course be such that it has an inhibiting effect atleast on “standard” or commonly used video capture systems currently inuse; and in particular those having an analogue to digital conversionsystem which has a sync pulse amplitude responsive gain adjustment meansand/or black level adjustment means responsive to the level of the, orpart of the, back porch.

In this scheme, in choosing which modifications to make the originalvideo signal, the object is to permit viewing on a “standard”television, or as many sets of different manufacture as possible, and atthe same time to impair the “pirateability” of the signal such as by themaking of a digital copy using a video capture system. In doing so theuser, that is the operator, of the protection system, must make acompromise which optimises the degree of digital processing disruption(for example copy protection or conversion impairment)—that is theextent of interference with copying and the number of systems on whichinterference occurs (referred to generally in this application as“conversion impairment”), against the requirement to ensure that theoriginal signal remains viewable to a reasonably acceptable standard(“viewability”) on as many different models of television (or otherviewing means which use an analogue video input) as possible. In shortthe user must choose a good balance between impairing pirateability andmaintaining viewability.

Accordingly, a method of choosing the parameters for such a signal willnow be described. The method comprises evaluating the impact of theaforesaid disruption components in a number of video capture systems andchoosing the relevant parameters to optimise the effect. To assess theeffects, a panel of representative viewers or persons skilled indetermining whether an image is unacceptably impaired may be used. Also,analytical computer based methods involving comparison of the content ofthe original modified signal and the resulting digital signal may beused.

The method preferably also comprises applying the modified video signalin analogue form to a display device, such as a television set,evaluating the impact of the disruption components on the playback ofthe signal on the device, and choosing parameters which permit themodified video signal to be viewed on such equipment to an acceptablelevel of viewability. Again, panels of representative viewers, skilledpersons, or analytical computer based techniques may be used todetermine what is acceptable.

Preferably, the steps of evaluating the effect of the disruptioncomponents on the analogue to digital converter and the display deviceare carried out simultaneously, or substantially simultaneously, so thatthe parameters of one or more disruption components can be adjusted, andthe balance between conversion impairment and viewability, maximized.

The parameters of the disruption components which may be varied duringthe tests may include the duration of the signal comprising thedisruption component, the magnitude of the signal and its location, aswell as the rate of change of each of the foregoing parameters, forexample if the magnitude of the signal is increased and decreased in astepwise or continuous manner.

Preferably such conversion impairment parameter optimisation process iscarried out in relation to a plurality of video capture systems and aplurality of television viewing equipment. In certain cases videocapture systems may not be affected by the disruption components to amaterial degree and in such case such video capture systems may beexcluded from such testing. Likewise certain television viewingequipment may not reach an acceptable standard of viewability and mayfor that reason be excluded from testing.

It should be understood that these modifications differ frommodifications used to protect signals from copying on a standard videotape recorder. When testing the modified video signal on standard videotape recorders there was little impact on the copyability of themodified signals.

The expression ‘modified video signal’ in this application, is notrestricted to the situation in which an unmodified signal (for example abroadcast standard signal) is input into modification circuitry in orderto add the disruption components, and also includes therefore a signalwhich may is created ab initio. For example, the ‘modified video signal’may be created by combining the picture information from one source withstandard timing and control information (such as horizontal sync pulsesand colour bursts) from another source, and the disruption componentsfrom a third source. In another example, the timing and disruptioncomponents may be created from one source, and added to the pictureinformation.

Ways of making acceptable copies of a video signal containing one ormore disruption components will now be considered. These can be thoughtof as circumvention processes, reducing the effects of the disruptioncomponents to an acceptable level or negating the effects of thedisruption components altogether. Making copies includes successfullyconverting an analogue signal to a digital signal, even if the digitalsignal is not finally recorded.

Such methods may involve one or more of inserting a signal which cancelsor reduces one or more of the disruption components; replacing thesection of the video signal which has been modified by the inclusion ofthe disruption components by a section which is acceptable to the videocapture system; or inserting a signal which is interpreted by videocapture system in a manner which cancels the effect of the disruptioncomponent. Additionally, use of a video capture system which isinsensitive to the disruption components may also circumvent theprotection provided by the invention.

“Copying” a video signal modified in accordance with the presentinvention, may therefore be made by inputting such a signal into a videocapture system which is insensitive to or is designed to be insensitiveto one or more of the disruption components.

Where the circumvention process comprises the addition of a furthersignal which cancels the disruption components, the addition will dependon the nature of the disruption component itself. For example, if in therelevant disruption component, the amplitude of the horizontal syncpulse is increased or decreased the method may simply insert a syncpulse of the correct amplitude or sufficiently correct amplitude.Alternatively, a pulse of the opposite magnitude to the existingalteration to the sync pulse tip may be inserted, either so as toeliminate or reduce the existing alteration, or to reverse its effect. Acounteracting pulse on the sync tip, such as a short duration high pulsefor example, having the opposite polarity to the existing alteration tothe sync tip and the opposite effect on the video capture system as theexisting disruption component, may still allow the horizontalsynchronization pulse to be recognised by the video capture system.

If the back porch level is altered, the method may insert a signal atabout the 0 volts level. Alternatively, the method may blank the signalin the region of the back porch and insert a replacement signalconforming to the appropriate standards, or such that the signal can beconverted effectively by the video capture system. If the disruptioncomponent in the active signal line is added, then a counteracting pulsemay be added.

The specific examples are intended as illustrations of embodiments ofthe invention and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.Those skilled in the art will understand that there are many other waysof performing the invention.

In particular, the amplitudes referred to in the description are inaccordance with the positive transmission scheme employed in PAL andNTSC. It will be appreciated that the invention could also be usedhowever with negative transmission schemes.

The invention has been found to have application in preventing theoperation of a number of analogue to digital conversion devices, such asthe Hollywood DV-Bridge, DVC 80, and DVC 150 made by DAZZLE Multimedia,Theatre 2000 of ATI, AVDV Video Capture Board of Pinacle Systems, AV-800of Top Step Technology, and DVD Recorders such as the DMR-E30 ofPanasonic.

The invention claimed is:
 1. A method executable by a device to modifyan analog video signal and thereby impair analog to digital conversionof the signal, the analog video signal comprising a plurality ofhorizontal synchronization pulses, each adjacent a respective backporch, the method comprising: receiving the analog video signal formodification at the device; receiving disruption components from aremote source; modifying, by the device, at least one of the horizontalsynchronization pulses of the signal from its original form to have adifferent amplitude over at least a part of the pulse width, wherein themodifying is configurable to be based upon the disruption componentsreceived from the remote source; additionally modifying the region ofthe signal following the horizontal synchronization pulse from itsoriginal form, wherein the additional modifying of the region followingat least one of the horizontal synchronization pulses is configurable tobe based upon the disruption components received from the remote source;and outputting the modified video signal by the device, wherein themodified video signal is such that the modified video signal interfereswith the operation of an analog to digital video conversion system tosuch an extent that the output of the analog to digital video conversionsystem has a reduced quality on playback in comparison to the originalanalog video signal.
 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the modifiedregion of the signal following at least one of the horizontalsynchronization pulses is the back porch that follows the at least oneof the horizontal synchronization pulses.
 3. The method of claim 1wherein the modified region of the signal following at least one of thehorizontal synchronization pulses is adjacent to the backporch thatfollows the at least one of the horizontal synchronization pulses. 4.The method of claim 1 wherein the modifying comprises varying anamplitude of the modifications over time.
 5. The method of claim 1wherein the disruption components are based upon a response model for ananalog to digital converter that is associated with the device.
 6. Amethod executable by a device to modify an analog video signal andthereby impair analog to digital conversion of the signal, the signalcomprising a plurality of horizontal synchronization pulses, eachadjacent a respective back porch, the method comprising: receivingdisruption components from a remote source; receiving the analog videosignal by the device; modifying, by the device, a region of the analogvideo signal following at least one of the horizontal synchronizationpulses from its original form, wherein the modifying is configurable tobe based upon the disruption components received from the remote source;and outputting the modified video signal by the device, wherein themodified video signal is such that the modified video signal interfereswith the operation of an analog to digital video conversion system tosuch an extent that the output of the analog to digital video conversionsystem has a reduced quality on playback in comparison to the originalanalog video signal.
 7. The method of claim 6 wherein the region that ismodified is in the back porch following at least one of the horizontalsynchronization pulses.
 8. The method of claim 6 wherein the region thatis modified is adjacent to the back porch of the signal following atleast one of the horizontal synchronization pulses.
 9. The method ofclaim 6 comprising further modifying, by the device, at least one of thehorizontal synchronization pulses of the signal from its original formso that the at least one of the horizontal synchronization pulses has adifferent amplitude over at least a part of its pulse width.
 10. Themethod of claim 9 wherein an amplitude of the modification to the atleast one horizontal synchronization pulse changes over time.
 11. Themethod of claim 6 wherein an amplitude of the modification to themodified region following at least one of the horizontal synchronizationpulses changes over time.
 12. The method of claim 6 wherein thedisruption components are based upon a response model for an analog todigital converter that is associated with the device.
 13. An apparatusto process an analog video signal that comprises a plurality ofhorizontal synchronization pulses, the apparatus comprising: an inputconfigured to receive the analog video signal for modification; ananalog-to-digital conversion circuit; and circuitry configured to modifyat least a region of the signal following at least one of the horizontalsynchronization pulses from its original form to have a differentamplitude based upon disruption components received from a remotesource, and to output the modified video signal to the analog-to-digitalconversion circuit, wherein the modified video signal is such that themodified video signal interferes with the operation of the analog todigital video conversion circuit to such an extent that the output ofthe analog-to-digital circuit has a reduced quality on playback incomparison to the original analog video signal.
 14. The apparatus ofclaim 13 wherein the disruption components are based upon a responsemodel for an analog to digital converter that is associated with thedevice.
 15. The apparatus of claim 14 wherein the modified region of thesignal is a back porch adjacent at least one of the horizontalsynchronization pulses.
 16. The apparatus of claim 14 wherein themodified region of the signal is adjacent to a back porch that followsat least one of the horizontal synchronization pulses.